Luddite: after Ned Ludd – an English laborer who was supposed to have destroyed weaving machinery around 1779. One who opposes technical or technological change.
I’ve been mulling over the concessions I’ve made to technology. Where once I balked at having a home computer, it’s now an absolute necessity. I have a cell phone, but it’s a ‘pay-as-you-go’ that I’ve had for almost 5 years and does nothing but make phone calls. I’ve dipped into Facebook as it was suggested that the social networking thing was a good way to grow my business. The more I’m there, the less I want to be. So I keep going back and forth … to Facebook or not to Facebook. To Twitter or not – definitly not going there. Gotta say, I do love blogs. Oh and I am liking that flat panel TV with 5.1 surround sound we got for a housewarming/birthday/Christmas present. I digress…
So, my mulling lead to wondering with what faction of humanity I might be aligned … can’t help it, it’s just me and my obsession with naming things. I like the idea of the Steampunk movement, but most of the work that claims that moniker is not my flavor. I’m thinking I’ll start my own movement – Neo Luddite … maybe Revisionist Luddite. Some concessions are made, but my preference tends towards a mix of the old-fashioned and relatively minimal. Sort of the 30’s meets wabi-sabi.
Here’s a visual aid. Tis the season to exchange my summer ruby slippers (wabi-sabi) for freshly polished brown oxfords (30’s re-dux).

ruby slippers

lil ol man oxfords
As of late, there’s been a lot of ‘ruby slipper’ conversations. Then last night I was reading Mike Dooley’s new book Infinite Possibilities. Something to the effect of one way to help you get to where you want to go is ‘buy the shoes’. That’s one reason it’s time to haul out the oxfords – it’s what they represent for me. Five years ago, owning this pair of shoes would have been a total pipe dream. Today, I can put on these shoes and every step is an affirmation of how far I’ve come, what I’ve accomplished so far and how easy it is to keep on keepin’ on.
Thankfully, this day has brought several glimpses of clarity. Naming things is fun and could be useful as a marketing tool, but the bottom line and my ultimate goal is to simply enjoy each day. Have fun with my work, be open to new things and accept inspiration in whatever crazy form it appears.
A couple more things to consider:
“Don’t try to stand out from the crowd; avoid crowds altogether.” Hugh MacLeod
“#38 – Explore the other edge. Great liberty exists when we avoid trying to run with the technological pack. We can’t find the leading edge because it’s trampled underfoot. Try using old-tech equipment made obsolete by an economic cycle but still rich with potential.” – Bruce Mau’s Incomplete Manifesto
Avoid balance – I’m thinking it’s a lot more fun to have a raucous ride on the playground swing than to sit calmly on the see-saw with it’s well-defined boundaries. I want the wind in my face and the better view. Danielle makes a good case for this here.
I think that’s enough for now. This will be me clicking the heels of my oxfords and sailing joyfully into the night.
blessings – kvk



8 comments
Comments feed for this article
26 October 2009 at 7:02 pm
mansuetude
lol … love the rubies and the way this is going around…
had a massive shoe fetish when i lived in Boston; they just seemed to find me, loved them.
thought provoking post!
i am up for avoiding balance right now; and avoiding technology though a cell phone with some jazz in it has been useful way out here… in the city it didn’t seem needed cause there are people and technology packed in against you everywhere…. don’t want to find myself in a ditch out here asking a swamp snake for directions … but then the phone goes out of power range too… need to click my shoes… ;)
buying the shoes kinda fits perfectly with the clicking of the ruby heels and saying there is no place like home, doesn’t it.
traveling into the future… into the desired yet to become… ours.
blessings
28 October 2009 at 11:13 am
Kathy Van Kleeck
Thanks M – I’ve had a shoe addiction for as long as I can remember. It’s eased up a bit – hard to improve on my current collection – of course there’s always room for zorries! And the technology thing has always been push/pull, love/hate. Might be interesting to do my own survey of my tech-y relationships – what makes something loved and needed, something else a nasty drag. And really, the only reason I see for cell phones is so you don’t have to rely on grumpy old snakes for help in a pinch.
26 October 2009 at 7:11 pm
Clara
Kathy, there’s always “PostLuddite.” I’m in your camp. I’m on Facebook, and was drawn to it at first like to a new, shiny object. But the object dulled pretty quickly. I’m very dependent on my Mac, but I don’t know my cell phone’s number, since I have it “for emergencies” and rarely turn it on. I’ve Twittered twice, both times in September to promote an event at BookOpolis that I thought others would find interesting and fun, and haven’t had a thought for a Tweet since then. I AM spending too much time following blogs, and have to figure out how to get that a bit more under control.
I don’t think I’m either anti-technology or afraid of it; it’s simply that there are too many other things that interest me more than Facebook or Twitter, and better ways to spend my time than having cell phone conversations while walking down the street or driving in my car.
I prefer to think of those of us who “mix it up” as selective and eclectic. We sample the bounty, then choose the package that works best for us. I’ve never subscribed to every element of any movement, whether fashion or politics, and I think I’d start getting a little nervous if I found myself heading in that direction.
P.S. Love both the ruby slippers and the oxfords.
28 October 2009 at 11:18 am
Kathy Van Kleeck
Clara – totally with you on the social network thing and I can’t see ever buying whole hog into any new trend or fashion. And like you, the computer challenge is to stay off of it so I can actually get some work done! These silly blogs – just so addictive!
27 October 2009 at 1:58 pm
lynne
wow, that danielle is something, isn’t she? i wonder if those of us born under an earth sign ever relish burning to a crisp like that? i think we just wanna be a slow, glowing ember… ; )
as for facebook, twitter – all of that, doesn’t it come down to how we *feel* about it? if doing it comes from the head and feels like a chore, then it ain’t gonna last no matter how good someone says it is for our business. but you already know this…
i love what i read this morning in ‘you are god get over it’ — “the challenge of abundance is only how much will you let yourself have. how strong can you tolerate its flow of change in your life? how much transformation, freedom, and love can you allow? how much of your story are you willing to let go of?”
uh huh…
burn on, baby…
xo
28 October 2009 at 11:35 am
Kathy Van Kleeck
Yeah, Danielle is something for sure. I agree with much of what she says, definitely not all.
I’m thinking that since I’m ‘fire’ everything is why I love wind and borderline chaos so much … Sagittarius and Pitta and something else that I can’t remember.
Not sure why I stick around of FB, keep thinking there’s a reason, not sure what.
“the challenge of abundance is only how much will you let yourself have” – herein lies my core issue. Really working on that right now. Definitely need to highlight that quote – what page?
Burnin bright!
xx
28 October 2009 at 9:15 am
mansuetude
love lynne’s quote
28 October 2009 at 11:35 am
Kathy Van Kleeck
yep, it’s a goodern